I didn't create The In-Between Codex because I believe I have all the answers. I created it because I spent years questioning the answers I had inherited.
Some of what I believed came from family. Some from culture, school, work, and the steady hum of other people's certainty. For a long time I didn't examine any of it, because none of it felt like belief — it just felt like reality.
The Codex grew out of what followed: lived experience, a long stretch of philosophical inquiry, ideas drawn from psychology, a great deal of contemplation, and an ongoing search for clearer thinking. I kept noticing that the useful part was never the conclusions. It was the questions that led there.
So these five volumes don't hand you a worldview. They offer a structure for examining the one you already carry — and the space to decide, consciously, what deserves to remain. I'm not a therapist, a psychologist, or a teacher with a doctrine. I'm someone who has walked this territory and tried to leave a clearer map than the one I was given.